Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arkansas - February 23, 2006
	Smith v. State, No. CR 05-294, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: Appellant convicted of two counts of rape for engaging in sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity was not entitled to post-conviction relief under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to question all witness, failing to inform appellant of a possible conflict of interest, or for failing to request a continuance. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Wilkerson v. State, No. CR 05-1187, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: A trial court did not err in failing to suppress defendant's confession to capital murder because the Arkansas police had properly advised defendant of his Miranda rights. The totality of the circumstances surrounding the interrogation by the police revealed both an uncoerced choice and the requisite level of comprehension by defendant. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Yankaway v. State, No. CR 05-1071, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 23, 2006, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court denied defendant's motion for the appointment of new counsel in substitution for his current counsel as defendant demonstrated no actual conflict of interest, and his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were not cognizable on direct appeal as they were not raised below. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.