Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arkansas - March 7, 2001
	Ward v. Switzer, CA 00-340, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2001, Opinion Delivered View this case - free   Overview: A contempt order requiring defendant's incarceration until he complied with discovery was reversed; since plaintiffs had already been granted judgment against defendant, the discovery issue was moot and a civil contempt order was not warranted. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Watson v. State, CACR 00-680, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2001, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Upon revocation of suspended sentences or probation, defendant could receive any sentence that could have been imposed originally, when he was found guilty, and court had discretion to run those sentences either concurrently or consecutively. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Whorton v. Needham, CA00-773, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2001, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Appellants also failed to rebut appellees' assertion that appellant stated that the easement at issue was the result of an oral agreement between both parties' predecessors in title. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Williams v. State, CACR00-519, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2001, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court had discretion to require appellant's counsel to provide a more accurate statement during voir dire of State's burden of proof. Though State attempted to shift burden of proof, jury was instructed that State had ultimate burden. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.