 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Air Compressor Equip. Co. v. Sword, CA 99-922,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 23, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer was required to pay for more expensive prosthesis and for toe amputation, which was causally connected to employee's compensable injury. Contractual waiver of travel expenses was invalidated by statute.
|
|||||
| Archer v. State, No. CACR 99-830,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court could not say that the finding that appellant's consent to search the truck was freely and voluntarily given was against the preponderance of the evidence and therefore affirmed.
|
|||||
| Blockman v. State, CA CR 99-892,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 23, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search that revealed crack cocaine in suspect's underwear was proper search incident to arrest; officers had probable cause to arrest because suspect matched description given by informant.
|
|||||
| Burnett v. State, No. CACR 99-932,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court did not conclude that the officer's in-court identification of appellant was tainted from being shown only one photograph because so little time passed between observing the transaction and viewing the photograph.
|
|||||
| Chatt v. State, No. CACR 99-785,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a probation revocation proceeding, trial court did not err, as evidence supported the conclusion that the appellant possessed a firearm in violation of the conditions of his probation and suspended sentence.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. State, No. CACR99-751,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mistrial denied; comments by prosecutor in rebuttal to defendant's closing argument were not comments on defendant's failure to testify at trial.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. Dairy, CA 99-740,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 23, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment denying appellant workers' compensation benefits was reversed, since his testimony as to how the injury occurred was entirely consistent with the medical records, and was uncontradicted by his supervisor.
|
|||||
| Copeland v. Baldwin & Shell Constr., No. CA 99-778,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported Workers' Compensation Commission's conclusion that claimant's complaints and symptoms were inconsistent with organic brain damage occasioned by a specific incident.
|
|||||
| Eastern Livestock, Co. v. Helms, No. CA99-745,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment in suit to enforce a contract was affirmed. At time of contracting, parties were mutually mistaken in their assumptions regarding the weight of the steers; thus the contract was unenforceable.
|
|||||
| Gatheright v. State, No. CACR 99-916,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant entering conditional plea and attempting to preserve right to appeal adverse determination of motion to suppress had to abstract record relating to plea for court to determine whether it had jurisdiction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
