LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - March 8, 2001

  
Advance Am. v. Garrett, 00-1287, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erroneously considered merits of claim when deciding whether to certify class; finality principles did not apply to class-certification rulings and order certifying class could be amended any time prior to decision on merits.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bledsoe v. State, CR 00-799, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly admitted evidence at a rape trial of a burglary defendant committed just prior to the rape, and defendant was not prejudiced by trial court's ex parte communications with the jury during deliberations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Coleman v. State, CR 00-414, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gaddie v. State, CR 00-1232, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: There was no proof offered that a notice of appeal was mailed to the circuit clerk, or if it was mailed that it was mailed in time to reach the clerk for filing within the 30 day period allowed to file a timely notice of appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Greene v. State, CR 96-362, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Harris v. City of Little Rock, 99-1316, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: While city's use of tax funds to offset losses due to its pledging user fees to repay bonds would violate state constitution's ban on using taxes to repay such bonds, taxpayer failed to prove that the city had done so.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Harshaw v. State, CR 00-1130, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because evidence supported finding that appellant formed his belief for use of deadly force recklessly, a manslaughter instruction was warranted; the trial court committed reversible error in failing to give the it.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hyatt v. State, CR 00-1329, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where petitioner did not establish good cause for his failure to timely perfect his appeal, and did not pursue the courses available to him to extend time for lodging record on appeal, his motion to proceed with belated appeal was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jordan v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co., 00-1325, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Provision in an auto insurance policy that excluded the named insured from coverage as a driver was not void as against public policy, so his insurer had no duty to defend him in a suit based on his alleged negligent driving.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
King v. State, CR 95-884, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner could request a photocopy of the transcript, but that he had to pay for the photocopying cost. Petitioner did not offer any support for his motion requesting copies of the material at the public's expense. Thus, motion was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.