 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Boyette v. Vogelpohl, CA01-00642,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no boundary by acquiescence and conveyor's children failed to establish elements of adverse possession where use of roadway was question of fact, and it was unclear whether children's activities took place on disputed portion.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Brown, CA 01-953,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Increase in child support and finding of contempt were upheld where husband withheld several tax returns and there was inconsistency in support award, but retroactivity was not appropriate and corporal punishment was not per se child abuse.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. State, CACR01-634,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in admitting motive evidence that robbery was reason defendant murdered the victim. Overwhelming other evidence, including a confession and presence of defendant's blood at scene, made any error harmless.
|
|||||
| Davidson v. State, CA CR 01-713,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based on the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, the trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence in his trial for possession of drugs. Judge properly exercised discretion in sentencing.
|
|||||
| Gerrald v. Douglas Tobacco Prods., CA 01-745,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An increase in employee's wage-loss disability benefits was not warranted, as nature and intensity of employee's pain and extent of her physical limitations was not substantially different from that which she related at initial benefits hearing.
|
|||||
| Holloway v. State, CACR01-620,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's counsel was ordered to rebrief the appeal due to counsel's failure to address the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the revocation of defendant's probation.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Ramsay, CA 01-404,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Original document contained sufficient words of conveyance to create easement between parties. Evidence demonstrated that easement was not later abandoned as predecessors testified that easement was used up until property was sold.
|
|||||
| Lambert Constr. Co. v. Fitch, CA 01-1013,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Distal phalanx excision surgery was reasonably necessary, and therefore compensable. Employee complained of daily throbbing pain in his foot, which left him so disabled he could not wear shoes, and which first surgery failed to relieve.
|
|||||
| Reed v. State, CACR 01-707,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported guilty verdict as defendant, although he did not take part in every wrongful act, threatened victim during ordeal, rode in stolen truck, and attempted to flee police when they came to his house.
|
|||||
| Singson v. State, CACR01-268,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Period of time from date of request to date mental evaluation was filed was excluded from speedy trial calculation. Thus, trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss for alleged violation on same grounds.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
