Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arkansas - February 25, 2004

  
Abernathy v. Adous, CA 03-640, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in holding that a subtenant was an assignee rather than sublessee and therefore was not required to surrender possession of commercial premises upon breach by original lessee where the parties' intended him to have been a sublessee.

Search Cases for Free

  
Burnside v. State, CACR03-758, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict because there was sufficient evidence that he had knowledge that the 40 pounds of marijuana was in the trunk, and he exercised control over the car by driving it.

Search Cases for Free

  
Carroll v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 03-788, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, February 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The evidence was sufficient to find that terminating the parents' parental rights was in the children's best interests as there would be potential harm to the children by continued contact with the parents.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cincinnati Life Ins. v. Mickles, CA 03-182, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Insurer's and its agent's motions for directed verdict on policy owner's claim of tort of outrage were properly denied, where there was evidence that student reference to insured was added by insured or agent, not by owner.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cogburn v. Wolfenbarger, CA 03-735, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, February 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court's finding of incapacity and appointment of a permanent guardian of the mother's estate was clearly erroneous where there was no statement of a qualified professional or findings with respect to her adaptive behavior.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cooney v. State, CACR03-635, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's spontaneous statement to an officer questioning a passenger of his car about cocaine in the car was admissible because it was not compelled or the result of coercion under the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cordell v. State, CACR03-797, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendants did not filed a written motion to allow an in camera hearing on the admissibility of testimony covered by the rape shield law, they waived their right to challenge the application of that law on appeal.

Search Cases for Free

  
Davis v. State, CACR 03-364, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The finder of fact could have inferred that defendant intended to commit a theft when the victim's possessions were taken from him, even though defendant contended that he and his accomplices were merely teaching the victim a lesson.

Search Cases for Free

  
Hamilton v. McCaughan Props., L.P., CA03-606, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where southern landowners' predecessor built a levee far south of a surveyed boundary more than 50 years earlier and northern landowner and predecessor used the intermediate tract as their own, the northern landowner proved boundary by acquiescence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Huey v. State, CACR03-651, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A letter written by defendant while in jail to his children was relevant at his trial for beating his former wife because he had written that he had "gotten meaner" toward people who crossed him and that it was one of the reasons he was in jail.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top