 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Aydelotte v. State, No. CR 04-822,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was required to submit a substituted appellate brief that conformed to the rules; while his motion seeking an extension of 60 days to file the brief was denied, his motion for extension of time to file the brief was granted for 40 days.
|
|||||
| Blackwell v. State, No. CR 98-456,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petitioner's third petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied, as none of the claims raised by petitioner demonstrated that there was some fundamental error at trial or that there existed some fact that would have prevented rendition of the judgment had it been know to the court.
|
|||||
| Carquest of Hot Springs, Inc. v. Gen. Parts, Inc., 04-827,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order granting distributor's motion to dismiss did not resolve the corporation's claims or any of the claims the distributor alleged. The corporation failed to request certification pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(1). Dismissal of claims underlying a class action did not equate to denial of class certification under Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 2(a)(9).
|
|||||
| Edwards v. State, CR 04-1127,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The state supreme court again ordered an attorney to appear before it to show cause as to why he should not be held in contempt of court because he had failed to pay a fine as ordered after previously being held in contempt, and because he failed to remedy a situation involving the payment of his delinquent bar dues.
|
|||||
| Green v. State, No. CR 03-899,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court erred in failing to make specific findings in denying defendant's petition for postconviction relief because the record did not conclusively show that the error alleged by defendant was not fundamental. It was not clear from record what questions were posed by the jury that resulted in an in-chambers conference without defendant's presence.
|
|||||
| In re Supreme Court Comm. on Model Jury Instruction, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Simes, 04-77,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Client filed an insufficient record on appeal where, under Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 6(c), the lawyer did not check out the record or file an appellee's brief, which meant that the lawyer did not in good faith agree to the abbreviated record. Pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 3(g), the lawyer was not put on notice that an abbreviated record was involved.
|
|||||
| Ligon v. McCullough, 04-1395,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McClellan v. State, No. CR 04-1318,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
