 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alexander v. State, No. CR 06-148,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was properly denied because Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-202(1) did not allow for the testing of evidence unrelated to an inmate's particular case; the inmate sought to test a handgun used in another case to establish that he was not the perpetrator of a murder.
|
|||||
| Bell v. State, No. CR 06-871,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's pro se motion asking that another attorney be appointed to represent him was held in abeyance to be acted on after the inmate's current attorney appeared before the supreme court to show cause why the attorney should not be held in contempt for his failure to proceed as previously directed by the supreme court.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. State, No. CR 07-128,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hampton v. State, No. CR 06-808,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.3, the trial court's written order contained no reference to any part of the pleadings or record, as required; without factual findings by the trial court concerning the hearing on defendant's petition for postconviction relief, the Arkansas Supreme Court was unable to conduct an adequate review.
|
|||||
| Heffernan v. State, No. CR 81-82,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition to reinvest jurisdiction in a trial court to consider petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied where none of the evidence presented supported petitioner's claims of insanity at time of trial or thereafter; documents relied upon by petitioner indicated only that he was suicidal prior to trial and mentally competent to stand trial.
|
|||||
| In re Adoption of Admin. Order No. 19, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Martin, No. 07-137,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Rudd, No. 07-143,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Supreme Court Comm. on Crim. Practice, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
