 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Leeper v. State, CR 00-852,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted appellant's petition for writ of certiorari and issued an order to bring up: (1) any hearing held on a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence; (2) the plea agreement; and (3) the plea proceedings.
|
|||||
| Leggins v. State, CR 00-1052,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant did not file a petition to correct his sentence until 20 years after he was sentenced and he could not prove that the sentence was illegal on its face; thus, the trial court properly dismissed his petition.
|
|||||
| Marcum v. Wengert, 00-828,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In landlord/tenant dispute, because fraternity's officers were not individually liable, and landlord was liable for more damages for breaching the lease than fraternity was, fraternity and officers were the prevailing parties.
|
|||||
| Newton v. State, CACR 99-1293,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of error coram nobis denied where allegations of newly discovered exculpatory evidence would not have sustained reasonable probability conviction would not have resulted had the information been presented to jury.
|
|||||
| Ray v. State, CR 00-471,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because appellant was charged as an adult in circuit court, the police were not required to stop questioning until a parent was present or to obtain parental consent to appellant's waiver of his right to counsel.
|
|||||
| Rineco Chem. Indus. v. Weiss, 00-763,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court concluded a sale did not take place during the audit period; thus, the purchased machinery and equipment was not involved in the production or manufacture of articles of commerce and did not qualify for exemption.
|
|||||
| Stevens v. State, CR 00-1338,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for rule on the clerk granted where court-appointed counsel filed notice of appeal, but was later appointed to bench and mistakenly believed he could not lodge partial record to perfect appeal from conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
