 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Soterra v. Albert, CA00-00776,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a property dispute, chancellor did not err in finding landowner had failed to show elements of adverse possession when landowner had merely claimed that it marked boundary by painting trees and neighbor asked for permission to cross land.
|
|||||
| Stinnett v. State, CACR01-751,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State proved that defendant violated terms of probation by failing to pay fines, when he was employed and offered no reason for stopping payment. Testimony was sufficient to demonstrate defendant solicited a child while on probation.
|
|||||
| Stogsdill v. Stogsdill, CA 01-829,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, February 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that son, who was discharged in bankruptcy, owed mother's estate was upheld where action to recover was within statute of limitations, post-petition debt fell outside scope of will, and future advances clause secured post-petition debt.
|
|||||
| Tacker v. Dir. of the Ark. Empl. Sec. Dep't, E01-121,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of gin company worker's claim for unemployment benefits where he quit without good cause, in a fit of anger over boss's grin, and did not take steps to prevent perceived mistreatment before quitting.
|
|||||
| Washburn v. Bruffett, CA01-00553,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where patient signed consent form and surgery was supervised by phone, summary judgment was improper for resident doctors because expert testified it would have been successful if performed by supervising surgeon.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Williams, CA01-1017,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Visitation schedule which involved mother's duty to make 120-mile round-trip two days per week to facilitate father's midweek visitation did not interfere with mother's job as she was able to easily change her work schedule to meet that duty.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
