LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - February 22, 2007

  
In re Supreme Court Comm. on Crim. Practice, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jarrett v. State, No. CR 07-56, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Long v. Ark. HHS, No. 06-796, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Termination of a mother's parental rights was proper, Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341, because the evidence showed that she failed to address her problems with drug abuse, failed at providing any meaningful proof of employment, and refused to establish proof of a stable living environment for her children.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Nash v. Hendricks, No. 06-968, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a legal malpractice case, a court properly granted summary judgment to a law firm because the Feres doctrine barred the underlying medical-malpractice claim; therefore, because plaintiff could not have prevailed on the medical-malpractice claims, he could not prove that, but for negligence, the outcome of the case would have been different.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pest Mgmt., Inc. v. Langer, No. 06-748, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a contract dispute regarding pest control, the denial of arbitration was error because the contract clearly showed an intent to arbitrate, and the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.S. §§ 1-16, applied since it was a transaction involving commerce.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Reese v. State, No. CR07-112, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion for rule on the clerk was granted, as appellant's attorney candidly admitted fault. The attorney stated in the motion that he failed to have a hearing regarding the motion for extension of time.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Savage v. State, No. CR 06-526, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Postconviction relief should have been granted based on ineffective assistance of counsel where the record showed a reasonable probability that an inmate would not have entered a guilty plea to first-degree sexual assault had he known that he was not eligible for parole in five years under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-93-609 due to a prior conviction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wagner v. GMC, No. 06-814, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Rebriefing was ordered in case involving component-parts doctrine because appellants substantially failed to provide supreme court with argument section as required by Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(a)(7); arguments as briefed would require supreme court to "dig out" particular paragraph or point which dealt with specific asserted point.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilson v. State, No. CR 07-102, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 22, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.