 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC. v. ARKANSAS PAINTING & SPECIALTIES CO., 99-1071,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Notice provisions of mechanic's lien statute were not strictly complied with, and claimant's lien was not perfected.
|
|||||
| Ball v. State Dep't of Community Punishment, 99-917,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's suit against appellee individuals was properly dismissed since appellee individuals were immune from suit and appellant was an at-will employee and could have been fired for any reason.
|
|||||
| Butler v. State, No. 99-1325,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appeal of denial of writ of habeas corpus was proper since prisoner could not show the circuit court which accepted his plea lacked jurisdiction given the then existing law regarding transfers to juvenile court.
|
|||||
| Easley v. State, CR 00-144,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Etoch v. Simes, 99-467,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imposition of fine and jury costs on defendant's attorneys was affirmed because manipulation of the judicial system was a contemptuous act and there was substantial evidence to support the finding of criminal contempt.
|
|||||
| McGhee v. State, No. CR 99-554,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Oates v. Oates, 99-108,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce proceeding appellee did not provide an expressed waiver of the requirement of corroboration to her alleged grounds; appellant was contesting divorce and no waiver or stipulation had been reached.
|
|||||
| Orsini v. Beck, No. 98-1013,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Osborn v. State, CR 99-584,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 24, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant delayed case by missing trial; delaying act was memorialized by record taken at time it occurred. Record was sufficient to satisfy requirements of Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.3(i) and no speedy trial violation occurred.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
