Arkansas, February, 2003, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Arkansas - February 26, 2003

Mills v. State, CACR 02-651, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Sufficient evidence supported the revocation of defendant's suspended sentence, where the State presented copies of defendant's insufficient funds checks that he exchanged for merchandise as proof that he committed theft by deception.

Search Cases for Free

Porch v. State, CACR02-496, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: The victim's identification of defendant's, coupled with the seven-year-old child's identification of defendants at trial, constituted substantial evidence to support defendants' conviction for aggravated robbery and aggravated assault.

Search Cases for Free

Sherman Waterproofing v. Darragh Co., CA 02-660, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 26, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Appellate court dismissed an appeal of the trial court's grant of summary judgment as moot where defendant corporation and its principal had paid the judgment granted to plaintiff company.

Search Cases for Free

Stouffer v. Kralicek Realty Co., CA 02-621, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 26, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Plaintiff home buyer's appeal of a summary judgment entered in favor of co-defendant real estate listing agent was dismissed where the certificate of final judgment did not contain specific factual findings upon which the decision was based.

Search Cases for Free

Watkins v. State, CACR02-667, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: The evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's probation revocation for committing carnal abuse where defendant had sex with a 15 year old girl, although she told defendant that she was 16 years old.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal