 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mills v. State, CACR 02-651,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported the revocation of defendant's suspended sentence, where the State presented copies of defendant's insufficient funds checks that he exchanged for merchandise as proof that he committed theft by deception.
|
|||||
| Porch v. State, CACR02-496,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The victim's identification of defendant's, coupled with the seven-year-old child's identification of defendants at trial, constituted substantial evidence to support defendants' conviction for aggravated robbery and aggravated assault.
|
|||||
| Sherman Waterproofing v. Darragh Co., CA 02-660,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, February 26, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court dismissed an appeal of the trial court's grant of summary judgment as moot where defendant corporation and its principal had paid the judgment granted to plaintiff company.
|
|||||
| Stouffer v. Kralicek Realty Co., CA 02-621,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, February 26, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff home buyer's appeal of a summary judgment entered in favor of co-defendant real estate listing agent was dismissed where the certificate of final judgment did not contain specific factual findings upon which the decision was based.
|
|||||
| Watkins v. State, CACR02-667,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, February 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's probation revocation for committing carnal abuse where defendant had sex with a 15 year old girl, although she told defendant that she was 16 years old.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
