 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lea v. State, CR 03-161,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus could not be issued by Arkansas court, as defendant was incarcerated in Kansas. Even if relief could be granted, it was not warranted, as defendant failed to raise a claim upon which habeas corpus could issue.
|
|||||
| Rigsby v. Rigsby, 03-318,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in determining that the son was entitled to an undivided one-half interest in the surface and mineral rights of the property where the father did not provide arguments supported by sufficient citation to legal authority.
|
|||||
| Robbins v. State, CR 98-1394,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where sentencing jury clearly found that one aggravating factor existed, that the aggravating factor outweighed any mitigating factors, and that the death penalty was justified, inconsistent findings regarding a mitigating factor were harmless error.
|
|||||
| Scamardo v. Jaggers, 03-765,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme Court of Arkansas declined to overrule case that held that nonprofit could be found liable, but the prevailing party in lawsuit against the nonprofit could not execute on property or assets of nonprofit in order to satisfy any judgment.
|
|||||
| Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Barber, 03-57,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a railroad found a complaining passenger's counsel eavesdropping on jury deliberations but did not report the incident until after a verdict was returned unfavorable to the railroad, the railroad's motion for a mistrial was properly denied.
|
|||||
| West v. State, CR 03-987,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could not prevail on appeal on the issue of whether his attorney was ineffective for failing to object to the composition of the jury, as his petition was conclusory in nature without factual substantiation that he was prejudiced.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
