 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Billingsley v. Evans, No. CA 99-925,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child custody dispute, chancellor's decision to grant custody to appellee father was not in error and not clearly against a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Burdyshaw v. State, CA CR 99-685,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 1, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Extension of appellant's expectation of privacy to driveway was not reasonable and entry was not prohibited by Fourth Amendment; officers had probable cause and obtained written consent from owner before commencing search.
|
|||||
| Crudup v. Regal Ware, Inc., CA 99-797,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 1, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of workers' compensation benefits for appellant's carpal tunnel syndrome improper; appellant met his burden of proving injury was caused by his employment, and that carpal tunnel syndrome was major cause of disability.
|
|||||
| Daugherty v. State, No. CACR99-996,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a vehicle was stopped after being observed turning a corner too fast in a residential neighborhood there was probable cause to stop the vehicle, and the gun found on the driver's person was admissible.
|
|||||
| Dupps v. McClung, No. CA99-451,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Collateral estoppel barred property owners from relitigating the same issues against an insurance agent and agency that they had litigated successfully in a prior lawsuit against the previous property owners.
|
|||||
| Ellis v. Bennett, CA 99-652,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, March 1, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant grandparents were not eligible under statute to petition for visitation of child because child had been legitimated when putative father married child's mother and publicly acknowledged paternity.
|
|||||
| Fabricius v. Fabricius, No. CA 99-711,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because parties' actions were consistent with agreement's provisions and not indicative of its abrogation, chancellor's finding reconciliation agreement was valid and binding was not clearly against preponderance of evidence.
|
|||||
| Foreman v. State, No. CACR 98-1348,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's testimony that he had "some previous knowledge" of appellant prior to shooting incident was not so prejudicial as to require a mistrial.
|
|||||
| Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Nelson, No. CA 99-929,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where there was a causal link between employee's employment and his skin condition, the condition was a compensable occupational disease and the fact that it could have occurred in other jobs did not preclude compensation.
|
|||||
| Hedger Bros. Cement v. Stump, CA 99-750,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 1, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor's refusal to grant defendant's easement by necessity was clearly erroneous. Plaintiffs failed to establish boundary by acquiescence or sufficient injury to enjoin defendant from draining water onto their property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
