 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berger v. State, CR 02-350,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's one-page order denying postconviction relief was not in compliance with applicable rule of criminal procedure, as the appellate court could not effectively review the evidence and the court's reasoning regarding its conclusions.
|
|||||
| Colburn v. State, CR 02-731,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was charged separately on two counts of committing domestic battering in the third degree on August 14th and 15th, but pled guilty to latter charge first, in city court, the State could not then enhance the former charge to a felony.
|
|||||
| Gaines v. State, CR 02-101,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Supreme Court permitted appellant one final opportunity to submit a brief that conformed to the state supreme court's rules; appellant was directed to file a complying abstract, addendum, and brief within 30 days.
|
|||||
| Gondolfi v. Clinger, CR 02-828,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for a writ of prohibition was denied because defendant's speedy trial rights were not violated; the evidence showed that less than 12 months had elapsed after several excludable time periods were subtracted.
|
|||||
| Hoffman v. State, CR 02-683,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order dismissing defendant's petition to correct an illegal sentence was affirmed because the petition was filed more than 90 days after the date judgment was entered following his guilty pleas; the time limitation was jurisdictional.
|
|||||
| King v. State, CR 02-645,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martinez v. State, CR 01-1114,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A police officer from another jurisdiction had authority to arrest defendant as the latter was seen leaving a crime scene because the local jurisdiction had asked for help and the foreign jurisdiction had a written policy on how to give such help.
|
|||||
| Seay v. Quinn (In re Estate of Seay), 02-650,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the heirs did not file a sufficient record to place their issues on appeal before the appellate court, the appellate court could not decide the issues on appellate review, and the trial court's judgment was affirmed.
|
|||||
| State v. 258,035.00 United States Currency, 02-1041,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where no motion was filed by an opposing party to set aside two default judgments, the trial court lacked the authority to set aside the default judgment and entered an order forfeiting the property to the county general fund.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
