 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bomar v. Moser, No. 06-895,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court improperly granted two attorneys summary judgment on a shareholder's legal malpractice action where there were issues of fact as to whether the shareholder had standing and whether the attorneys committed acts of fraudulent concealment that tolled the statute of limitations set forth in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-105(3) (Repl. 2006).
|
|||||
| Cochran v. Bentley, No. 06-743,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court properly entered a mandatory injunction requiring two landowners to remove a shop building where the protective covenant clearly prohibited any structure that was not incidental to residential use, the landowners' testimony showed that the building was not incidental to such use, and their defenses to its enforcement failed.
|
|||||
| Conlee v. Conlee, No. 06-586,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A wife was ordered to file a substituted addendum to conform to Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(a)(8) (2006) where she failed to include the relevant contempt petitions against her former husband in the addendum and without the petitions, it was impossible to decide the case on the merits or determine whether her arguments were preserved.
|
|||||
| Fordyce Bank & Trust Co. v. Bean Timberland, Inc., No. 06-734,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mills that purchased gatewood timber from an owner were buyers in the ordinary course of business under Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-9-201(9), 4-9-320, and timber, once cut, became inventory goods under Ark. Code Ann. §§ 4-9-501, 4-9-102(a)(48); thus, mills had no duty to conduct a lien search to find a creditor's perfected security interest in the timber.
|
|||||
| Hulsey v. State, No. CR 06-1311,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Deneen, No. 07-145,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. CR 07-149,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Loftis v. State, No. CR 06-827,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court lacked jurisdiction to address the allegations contained in appellant's motion for reconsideration of an order revoking a suspended sentence under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(d) where final judgment had been entered.
|
|||||
| Loveless v. State, No. CR 05-648 and CACR 04-525,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 1, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration of a motion for photocopies at public expense where he was not an attorney entitled to check out transcripts and the transcripts, briefs, and other materials he sought were not available in an electronic form.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
