 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Chase v. State, CACR00-651,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Voluntary manslaughter conviction reversed where evidence of an irrelevant prior bad act was admitted over defense objection, and trial court abused its discretion in refusing to instruct the jury on negligent homicide.
|
|||||
| Dotson v. State, CACR 00-797,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to quash panel for lack of black jurors was upheld where statutory voter registration lists method of juror selection provided a cross-section of the community. Prior bad acts were admissible under res gestae rule exception.
|
|||||
| Gabrion v. State, CA CR 00-473,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for pandering or possessing a visual or print medium depicting sexually explicit conduct involving a child, for possession of videotapes of 14 year-old girls undressing and putting on costumes was upheld. The scenes were lewd.
|
|||||
| Goman v. State, CACR00-121,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied directed verdict motion as evidence supported conviction on theft and forgery charges. Appellant deposited checks of others into his accounts, withdrew money from them, and forged deceased payee's name on check.
|
|||||
| Hockersmith v. Hockersmith, CA 00-889,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's failure to object to extrinsic evidence at trial waived her right to so object on appeal and no need existed to decide the validity of decedent's holographic will, as finding he lacked testamentary capacity was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Hyatt v. State, CACR 00-869,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of State's second petition to revoke suspension of sentence, after first petition was denied, was upheld because collateral estoppel was not a bar in that the second one was in regard to a new offense committed on pre-confinement furlough.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Tim Byrd, Angela Byrd & Randolph Co., CA 00-783,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court correctly refused to allow appellants to attack county court order, issued four years earlier, permitting county to use road on appellants' property, as order was not void on its face and county court had subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Maulding v. Heasley, CA00-989,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent's widow was not forced to sell certain real property, pursuant to family settlement agreement requiring her to sell or lease property if she no longer lived on it, because, despite periodic absences, she still lived on property.
|
|||||
| Meeks v. State, CACR00-629,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that appellant had solicited sex from his victim and another underage boy on a previous occasion was admissible in rape trial as it tended to prove the depraved sexual instinct of the accused.
|
|||||
| Morris v. State, CACR00-848,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As appellant did not make a specific motion for a directed verdict at close of the State's case, or at close of the entire case, he was procedurally barred from challenging on appeal the sufficiency of the evidence to revoke his probation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
