 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Thompson v. Bennigans, CA 00-1000,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where administrative law judge (ALJ) found that worker injured his back at work and required medical treatment, but denied worker's claim for benefits, case was remanded because ALJ failed to make specific findings in support of ruling.
|
|||||
| Tweedy v. Counts, CA 00-771,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though there was a valid road closing of county road and ownership reverted to owners of property surrounding the road, the abutting property owners still had the right to use the road for ingress and egress to their property.
|
|||||
| Union County v. Grigsby, CA00-512,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of damages in condemnation case was affirmed, as trial court properly allowed expert to testify as to his opinion of the value of landowner's property before and after the taking, and the jury verdict was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Wackenhut Corp. v. Jones, CA 00-865,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee's knee replacement was made more likely than not as a result of a compensable on the job injury, it was a reasonable and necessary consequence. Injury exacerbated or accelerated the need for treatment.
|
|||||
| Watts v. State, CA00-576,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court would not consider challenge to order of forfeiture where pro se appellant did not comply with appellate rules regarding filing abstract of proceedings below.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
