|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arkansas - March 7, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Ganter v. Ark. HHS, CA06-1229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Even if a mother were to prevail about improvements in her home, the circuit court's judgment terminating the mother's parental rights was affirmed, where the mother did not challenge the circuit court's alternative ground for termination--that she had been indifferent to, or unable to remedy, her psychological problems.
|
|
| |
Gill v. State, CA CR 06-697,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: First defendant repeatedly kicked the second victim in thigh, causing physical injury; thus, he was properly convicted of third-degree battery, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-13-203, 5-1-102(14). Also, second defendant was guilty of second-degree battery because the second victim suffered serious physical injury, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-13-202(a)(1), 5-1-102(21).
|
|
| |
|
| |
Heydenreich v. Heydenreich, CA06-605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-315, because trial court offered no explanation, either from the bench or in its written order, for failure to divide equity in marital residence, matter was remanded to trial court. Trial court did not err in awarding ex-wife $ 150 per week in alimony as she was in poor health and her income was unequal to ex-husband's.
|
|
| |
Hodges v. John F. Jenkins Contr., Inc., CA06-591,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Oral contract between company and contractor for excavation work was for sale of services, not goods or an interest in land, and therefore was not subject to statute of frauds, Ark. Code Ann. § 4-2-107(1). Company promised to pay contractor to remove dirt; thus, contractor was the seller, the company the buyer, and services, not dirt, were sold.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|