 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pyle v. Pyle, CA03-1279,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 9, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where Arkansas judge held husband in contempt for failure to make truck payments and pay alimony pursuant to divorce decree, but held in abeyance any sanctions until nature of contempt was clear, the order was not final. Because no sanctions were imposed in the order appealed from, the appeals court dismissed the appeal for lack of a final order.
|
|||||
| Stevenson v. State, CACR04-527,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 9, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for delivering cocaine and possessing cocaine were proper where the evidence was sufficient to prove possession because it demonstrated that he possessed a substance containing 230 milligrams of cocaine.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Hamilton, CA 04-886,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 9, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Administratrix for the deceased wife's estate was barred by the doctrine of res judicata and claim-preclusion from contesting any issues concerning the son's paternity or the son's failure to name the deceased father's estate as an indispensible party to the paternity action. The son was a pretermitted heir under Ark. Code Ann. § 28-9-209(d).
|
|||||
| Valenzuela v. State, CACR03-373,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 9, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court granted defendant leave under Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(b)(3) to file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum to allow him to include, without translation, a videotape made of the encounter between defendant and a police officer demonstrating that he did not freely consent to a search of his vehicle.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Schuman, CA 04-709,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 9, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred by finding that a neighbor had acquired a prescriptive easement over a road because his act of placing gravel on a road and installing a gate were not sufficient to put the owner on notice of hostile use. The evidence showed that the neighbor's right arose from his wife's personal easement, which was not adverse to the owner.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, CACR04-140,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 9, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a manslaughter case, defendant's motion for a directed verdict should have been granted because the evidence did not show that he exited a car and shot a victim. The issue was properly preserved under Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1 because, even though it was only made once, defendant rested the case without presenting additional evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
