 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 06-495,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2007
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly terminated a mother's parental rights, Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341, because the mother had not attended medical appointments regularly, the caseworker testified that she notified the mother of appointments, that she had the mother sign the notifications as verification, and that the mother missed most of the appointments.
|
|||||
| Osborne v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA06-817,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a termination of parental rights case under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341, a trial court did not really enter a default judgment against a father due to a failure to appear, despite the use of such language, due to its extensive consideration of the evidence in the case.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. State, CACR06-210,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-411 was not void for vagueness and unconstitutional as applied to defendant as one of his convictions was under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, which was committed within 1000 feet of a church, which was a protected facility; defendant's conduct was within the statute's prohibition.
|
|||||
| Rodriguez v. M. McDaniel Co., CA06-866,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102, the employee failed to set forth two objective findings supporting her claim of a compensable injury where there was nothing in the medical records indicating why the employee was prescribed the mediation at issue and the physician testified that her neurological examination was within the normal limits.
|
|||||
| Talbert v. State, CACR06-689,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant's probation was revoked due to a sexual assault conviction and he challenged his revocation because he was not brought to a hearing within 60 days of his arrest as required by Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-310(b)(2), his argument was rejected because he expressly waived the 60-day requirement according to a docket entry.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, CACR06-720,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's probation was properly revoked where, as to one argument, she failed to raise it before the circuit court, and it was waived; as to her argument that the circuit court should have provided her with a written statement of the reasons for revocation, she did not object to that failure below, and waived her right to a written statement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
