 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AT&T Communs. of the Southwest, Inc. v. State PSC, 99-860,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While appellant asserted the forms submitted did not contain a projection of test year revenue, appellant had not supported that contention with any evidence from its abstract or the record.
|
|||||
| Bader v. State, CR 00-565,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court was well within its discretion in limiting appellant's use of religious questions that would range far beyond those needed to evaluate the qualifications of venirepersons to serve as impartial jurors.
|
|||||
| Brown v. Maxwell, 00-753,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Brown v. Post Prison Transfer Bd., 00-21,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was properly dismissed, as inmate did not demonstrate a good cause for not conforming to rules of procedure in filing her appellate brief. Further, federal mail box rule was inapplicable to Arkansas state court proceedings.
|
|||||
| Chapman v. Bevilacqua, 00-1318,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While taxpayer had standing to challenge city's expenditure of its monies to pay employees' salaries spending minimal time writing checks for federal program, statutes allowed city to do what it did in furtherance of legitimate public purpose.
|
|||||
| Collins v. State, CR 98-563,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dinkins v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 00-1401,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals erred by finding trial court's termination of parental rights was not supported by clear and convincing evidence of dependence and neglect where reunification plan was violated by parent in several respects.
|
|||||
| Flores v. State, CR 01-239,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gooden v. State, CR 00-845,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 22, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Obligation of appellant's counsel to represent appellant was not affected by negotiated plea agreements in other cases even if those agreements were predicated on appellant's agreement to drop his appeal, because appeal was never dismissed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
