 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bunch v. State, No. CR 06-1384,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's request for a further extension of time in which to file his brief was partially granted, where his brief was due no later than fourteen days following the date of the opinion; defendant failed to show that he was entitled to relief from the Arkansas Supreme Court's denial of his request for counsel.
|
|||||
| Childers v. Payne, No. 06-691,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a medical malpractice case against a chiropractor, where a patient failed to file a supplemental affidavit after a trial court held that the first one was too vague to comply with Ark. Code Ann. § 16-114-209, he was unable to argue for a reversal of the decision on appeal since he induced the action.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, No. 06-825,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied second motion for reconsideration of decision to dismiss appeal of denial of inmate's habeas petition because requirements established by court's prior cases did not add requirements beyond those in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-103. Court declined to strike down statute as unconstitutionally vague and thus eliminate well-established remedy.
|
|||||
| Ford v. Norris, No. 06-824,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for habeas corpus relief under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-103(a)(1) was properly denied in a first-degree murder case because errors in an amended judgment and commitment order regarding the class of felony were merely clerical in nature; this was not a proper basis for habeas corpus relief.
|
|||||
| Higgins v. State, No. CR06-1323,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Appellate Practice Concerning Defective Briefs, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Brown, No. 05-592,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, No. CR 06-842,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. CR 06-1486,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 8, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-112-105, the Circuit Court of Pulaski County did not have personal jurisdiction over defendant because he was incarcerated in Lee County; therefore, it could not issue a writ of habeas corpus that would be returnable to effect defendant's release, and defendant could not obtain the specific relief he sought.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
