 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Richardson v. State, CA CR 03-1066,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite the fact that an order suspending a sentence did not specifically state that defendant was supposed to surrender to police on a certain date, the failure to report violated the provisions requiring good behavior and a law-abiding lifestyle.
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, CACR03-269,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing a prosecutor to use leading questions to elicit testimony from a child in a sexual abuse case based on the child's age, her fear of defendant, and the serious and embarrassing nature of the case.
|
|||||
| Swinford v. State, CA CR 03-4,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, March 10, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's appeal of aggravated assault, theft by receiving, and fleeing convictions, judgment was reversed; trial court erred in refusing to allow cross-examination of two of the State's witnesses to show possible bias.
|
|||||
| Thronebury v. State, CA CR 02-974,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 10, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to the interpretation of the relevant statute, although a trial court had the authority to revoke defendant's probation, the imposition of an additional suspended sentence constituted an unlawful modification that mandated reversal.
|
|||||
| Waterall v. Waterall, CA 03-701,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 10, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In son's appeal of adverse determination in property dispute with his father, judgment was affirmed; promissory estoppel was not applicable and there was insufficient evidence to impose a constructive trust.
|
|||||
| White v. Remington Arms Co., CA 03-927,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Compensation benefits were limited because the employee failed to show a causal connection between a back injury and a subsequent disability, which was caused by the employee's decision to undergo unnecessary procedures.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
