 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ryles v. Alexander, No. CA99-632,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 8, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where order dismissing parties was not yet entered, order of lower court was not final under Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure and appeal could not be taken.
|
|||||
| Slocum v. State, No. CACR 99-391,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 8, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was substantial evidence to support appellant's conviction for solicitation to commit capital murder because appellant promised inmate bond money and $ 5,000 if inmate agreed to kill a witness against appellant.
|
|||||
| Stormes v. State, No. CACR 97-1259,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 8, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Possession of marijuana conviction was affirmed since defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, coerced custodial statement, and insufficient evidence, could not be addressed because they were not argued below.
|
|||||
| Swain v. State, No. CACR 99-364,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 8, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's argument that he did not stab, or encourage his co-assailant to attack, either victim was unpersuasive as he was charged as an accomplice, and there was substantial evidence he aided in attack and robbery.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Wallace, No. CA 99-1050,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 8, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation award of temporary-total disability benefits upheld as appellee was still within his healing period and it was found that appellant failed to offer suitable employment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
