LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - June 1, 2000

  
Ark. Tech Univ. v. Link, 99-665, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellees did not have vested property right in retirement benefits and their suit did not state a claim for unconstitutional deprivation of a property right; appellees' action was thus barred by sovereign immunity.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bisbee v. State, CR 99-1513, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of motion to suppress upheld; findings were not erroneous as promise was neither false nor an inducement of appellant's statements; appellant was not enticed by prospects of reward from those in authority.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Burrell v. State, CR 93-113, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Flowers v. Norman Oaks Constr. Co., No. 99-1520, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of workers' compensation benefits affirmed; substantial evidence supported finding of alcohol, circumstantial evidence that appellant drank at jobsite; testimony of emergency technician and nurse was trustworthy.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fox v. AAA U-Rent It, No. 99-707, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorneys were not entitled to attorney's lien on funds held by state finance department which resulted from attorneys' efforts in collecting refunds from taxes erroneously collected from business corporations.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. State, CR00-476, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jones v. State, 00-247, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Landreth v. State, CR 99-1498, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: An appeal of denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus could not permitted to go forward where it was clear on the facts and applicable law that appellant could not prevail.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mathis v. State, No. CR 00-551, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ouachita Trek & Dev. Co. v. Rowe, 99-58, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 1, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although trial court dismissed action seeking specific performance of option agreement on incorrect grounds, court affirmed dismissal because circumstances of case did not support the granting of specific performance.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.