 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. Allison, 03-24,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of law firm and associated individuals was affirmed; there was no cause of action in Arkansas for breach of warranty to obtain a specific result when an attorney advised his or her client regarding the outcome of a case.
|
|||||
| Bennett v. Lonoke Bancshares, Inc., 03-258,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Opinion Delievered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly granted a motion for summary judgment in a case involving a voting dispute because cumulative voting was not required for a bank holding company organized in 1987 since it was not mandated by the articles of incorporation.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. State, CR 03-570,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted an inmate's motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he filed the proper affidavit, which established that the inmate had no income in order to pay for the cost of the supplemental record.
|
|||||
| City of Rockport v. City of Malvern, 03-855,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004. Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city failed to meet its burden that it complied with the relevant annexation statute because there was no evidence that the city made a commitment to providing landowners with services within a reasonable time.
|
|||||
| Green v. State, CR 03-899,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hodges v. Norris, 02-786,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly dismissed an inmate's declaratory judgment action against a department of corrections because the inmate failed to show that his parole eligibility was being miscalculated in violation of the law.
|
|||||
| Manila Sch. Dist. No. 15 v. Wagner, 03-755,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A stay was appropriate, where a trial court entered an ex parte injunction after the court previously directed the trial court to dissolve a preliminary injunction that prohibited a school district from hiring anyone to replace a superintendent.
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Patterson, CR 04-108,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Weaver, 04-109,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
