|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arkansas - March 14, 2007
|
| |
Barnett v. State, CACR06-647,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A suspended sentence imposed in a theft case was properly revoked where witness testimony showed that defendant committed assaults, engaged in disorderly conducted, and was intoxicated in public, in violation of Ark. Code Ann. §§ 5-71-212(a), 5-71-207(a)(1), 5-13-207(a); moreover, he failed to pay the restitution owed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Hicks v. State, CACR 06-109,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported appellant's second-degree murder conviction under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-10-103 because, inter alia, despite appellant's assertion that he had not meant to kill the victim, the evidence showed that the victim was brutally murdered; under Ark. R. Evid. 510, appellant waived the husband-and-wife privilege.
|
|
| |
Int'l Paper Co. v. Hunter, CA06-911,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 14, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where an employee fell while operating a forklift, substantial evidence supported the Workers' Compensation Commission's decision that he suffered compensable injuries because, inter alia, he was operating a forklift in the course and scope of his employment, there was truly no explanation for his fall, and there were no witnesses to the fall.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|