 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Premium Aircraft Parts v. Circuit Court, No. 01-888,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 14, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action for misappropriation of trade secrets, dilution of trade name, and breach of fiduciary duty alleged economic injury and venue was not proper under statute providing venue in actions alleging physical damage to tangible property.
|
|||||
| Spears v. Mills, 01-887,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 14, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in recalling jury after discharge and polling individual jurors based on claim that jury misunderstood instructions. Arkansas law did not allow jury to correct or amend verdict once it was discharged and left presence of court.
|
|||||
| Threadgill v. State, CA 01-785,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 14, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In murder case, trial court did not err in allowing extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness as witness's testimony left doubt as to whether she admitted her earlier statement was a lie. Cumulative testimony was not prejudicial.
|
|||||
| White v. Norris, 01-396,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prisoner failed to show in his petition and on appeal that the department of correction had miscalculated his parole eligibility date in a manner inconsistent with the law in effect at the time he committed his crimes.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CR 02-71,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal of the denial of his motion for postconviction relief was dismissed where he could not prevail as the petition had been untimely filed in the trial court approximately six months after the mandate affirming his convictions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
