 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adametz v. Adametz, CA 03-782,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 24, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a husband's interest in a limited liability company was merely speculative based on the fact that it had no operational history or goodwill, a trial court did not err by failing to award a wife a portion of the husband's interest.
|
|||||
| Bizzell v. Bizzell, CA 03-557,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a child custody case, a trial court's decision to appoint an attorney ad litem after one parent rested their case was not erroneous because there was no set time limit for such an appointment, and the opposing party suffered no prejudice thereby.
|
|||||
| Cooper v. Barnes, CA03-1124,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in changing custody from maternal grandparents to biological father, who was 16 when the child was born, where the father actively sought to have paternity established and voluntarily assumed financial responsibility.
|
|||||
| Curley v. Old Reliable Cas. Co., CA 03-129,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partial collapse of insured's home from accumulation of snow did not fall within common understanding of "explosion," nor did that term as defined in the insurance policy cover such damage. The insurer was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| Delacey v. Delacey, CA 03-685,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce, the court properly divided the parties' property and awarded the wife custody of the two children, alimony, and attorney fees. For purposes of child support, the court erred in calculating the husband's income based only on one month.
|
|||||
| Ewings v. State, CA CR 03-440,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 24, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver was affirmed based on evidence that he moved a backpack on a bus that contained cocaine. The trial court properly rejected the jury's illegal sentencing recommendation.
|
|||||
| Gillyard v. State, CACR03-926,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence showed defendant failed 14 out of 15 drug tests over two year period after conviction, and that he had not completed court-ordered drug treatment, evidence supported probation revocation even though it was State's first petition.
|
|||||
| Global Bus. Solutions v. Crossett Sch. Dist., CA03-683,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation delivered equipment to a school district, but failed to receive payment from a bank or a financial company. Corporation was not entitled to replevin as title passed upon delivery.
|
|||||
| Greene County v. Vincent, CA03-940,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee had earlier back injury and history of back problems, particularly in L5-S1 regions of back where surgery was performed for new injury, but temporary total disability benefits were proper, as extent of new injury was previously undiagnosed.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Miller, CA 03-1177,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in modifying the custody order and granting the mother sole custody, where the joint-custody arrangement was not working and the child requested that the mother be awarded sole custody.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
