 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gray v. Gray, CA 99-1105,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 15, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A family court in one state could decline jurisdiction over an interstate child custody dispute in favor of another state where the other state had jurisdiction as the child's home state.
|
|||||
| Hartzog v. State, No. CACR 99-1051,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's convictions were affirmed because the evidence was sufficient to prove that the victim was physically injured and that appellant intended to cause the victim fright when he threatened her.
|
|||||
| Haywood v. State, No. CA99-1053,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal of a transfer of juvenile appellant's case to circuit court, the decision was affirmed because the appeal lacked merit; counsel's motion to withdraw was denied because the case had not yet been concluded.
|
|||||
| Hinkle v. State, No. CACR 99-761,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed because there was substantial evidence that appellant attempted to inflict a serious physical injury on the victim, and he failed to present authority for his claim that the theft conviction was void.
|
|||||
| John B. May Constr. Co. v. Jordon, No. CA99-993,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission decision that appellee employee proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to additional medical treatment as a result of his compensable injury was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Keenen v. Keenen, No. CA 99-783,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor hearing divorce proceeding had broad equitable power to achieve a fair result and had broad discretion to make an unequal division of marital property so long as he considered statutory factors.
|
|||||
| Kidd v. State, No. CACR 99-890,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Positive drug test and appellant's admission that she had used drugs while on probation was sufficient to prove that appellant had violated condition of her probation and justified revoking her probation.
|
|||||
| Like v. State, No. CACR 99-965,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's suspended sentence was revoked because the finding that he violated the conditions of suspension was not against the preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Mayberry v. Flowers, CA 99-599,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 15, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in failing to find that appellant proved that he stood in the position of a parent to a child, the dismissal decree was void because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order.
|
|||||
| Naylor v. City of Mayflower, No. CA 99-951,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appeal seeking postjudgment interest, the lower court judgment was affirmed because appellant was fully compensated for the use of his money by appellee's prior payments.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
