 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Millholland v. State, CACR 03-352,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant and co-defendant beat and restrained the victim, took his personal property and abandoned him in a field, the evidence was sufficient to support their convictions for kidnapping and robbery; all accomplice testimony was corroborated.
|
|||||
| Nelson v. State, CACR 03-756,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was tried for first-degree murder, but convicted of second-degree murder. His motion for directed verdict was limited to evidence and purpose as to first-degree murder. He failed to preserve issue of "knowingly" as to second degree murder.
|
|||||
| Rose Care, Inc. v. Coulter, CA 03-813,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The nursing home failed to preserve for appeal its arguments that the trial court erred in giving a certain jury instruction that incorporated certain federal regulations applicable to nursing homes.
|
|||||
| Sims v. State, CACR 03-351,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress, where the police had probable cause to stop defendant's car, as he had violated a traffic regulation, and no constitutional violation occurred.
|
|||||
| Woods v. State, CACR03-1000,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of assault, robbery, and theft. The victim was shot. Defendant went through the victim's pockets, a co-defendant took money from defendant, and the men tried to put defendant in a car trunk.
|
|||||
| Worksource, Inc. v. Dir. of Empl. Sec. Dep't, E03-118,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 24, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arkansas Board of Review properly awarded unemployment compensation benefits after finding a claimant was terminated from his employment for reasons other than misconduct. The claimant had a legitimate reason for refusing to work on a Saturday.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
