 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Olsten Health Servs., Inc. v. Arkansas Health Servs. Comm'n, CA 99-796,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 15, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No showing of unmet medical needs where permits of approval sought. Health Services Commission's finding that services available was supported by substantial evidence, not arbitrary or capricious, nor profoundly unfair.
|
|||||
| Rainer v. State, No. CACR 99-635,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction was affirmed but the sentence on the previous conviction was reversed because the trial court did not have the power to revoke probation after the probationary period had ended.
|
|||||
| Ram Indus. v. Sanders, No. CA99-716,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was entitled to workers' compensation benefits since there was substantial evidence upon which commission could find injury was caused when cable broke and weight of saw exerted sudden downward force on his shoulder.
|
|||||
| St. Edward's Mercy Med. Ctr. v. Stoner, No. CA 99-1035,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported Workers' Compensation Commission finding that appellee suffered a compensable injury to her back that arose out of and in the course of her employment.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Wallace, No. CA99-1034,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vehicle owner was not liable for driver's negligence under negligent entrustment theory because absent evidence of driver's incompetence, there was no basis for finding that owner negligently entrusted his vehicle to driver.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Selvidge, No. CA99-744,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sales agreement satisfied statute of frauds because property co-owner signed both as himself and as estate executor; appellees bought house "as is" so contract was not unconscionable; absent fraud, rescission was improper.
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, No. CACR99-428,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in allowing defendant to proceed pro se, admitting victim's pretrial identification of defendant, denying motion to suppress robber's clothing, or denying motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial.
|
|||||
| White v. Cooper Tire & Rubber, No. CA99-845,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court could not reverse the denial of claimant's workers' compensation benefits, because claimant failed to provide an abstract of the decision denying benefits for the court to review.
|
|||||
| Winslow v. D & B Mech. Contrs., CA 99-943,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, March 15, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The determinations of the workers' compensation commission were reviewed for substantial evidence, with great deference for credibility assessments, and were not disturbed.
|
|||||
| Young v. Young, No. CA 99-736,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 15, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a property division dispute arising out of a divorce case, husband was properly awarded his corporate stock since there was no evidence of commingling with marital property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
