 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Vimy Ridge Mun. Water Improvement Dist. No. 139 v. Ryles, No. 06-1028,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 15, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Water improvement district and bank sought foreclosure on properties for failure to pay delinquent taxes; dismissal was warranted because there was no compliance with Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b), as the judgment did not dispose of defendants listed in the complaint. Moreover, district failed to abstract the hearing on summary judgment motion.
|
|||||
| Yarbrough v. State, No. CR07-07,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 15, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rebriefing was ordered in case on review from appellate court's reversal of defendant's drug convictions because defendant's brief was not in compliance with Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(b)(3), as copy of suppression motion was not included in addendum and defendant's abstract of suppression hearing did not contain arguments made by counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
