 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Childers v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 05-30,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a motion seeking relief from the failure to perfect an appeal was filed by a mother challenging the termination of her parental rights and it was not plain from the record whether there was attorney error, the supreme court allowed the appeal to proceed but remanded the issue of attorney error to the trial court.
|
|||||
| In re Carroll , No. 05-253,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jones v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 04-426,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly terminated a mother's parental rights, Ark. Code Ann. ¿ 9-27-341, where she repeatedly missed her appointments with her various doctors, and she could not budget her money, such that she routinely ran out of food in the middle of the month, but she maintained cable TV.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, No. CR 05-35,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Koch v. Northport Health Servs. of Ark., LLC, 04-321,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a new trial because health care providers were not required to disclose that a local attorney was hired as a jury consultant and the administratrix did not show prejudice from the local attorney talking to two jurors with whom the local attorney was in a relationship.
|
|||||
| McGuire v. Glover, No. CR 05-199,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pickens v. State, No. CR 03-695,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rutledge v. State, CR 03-1280,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying hearing for post-conviction relief because of claim it mistakenly referred to defendant's medical records as being introduced during his testimony where records were introduced, even if not during defendant's testimony, and there would not have been a different outcome if counsel had obtained records before trial.
|
|||||
| State v. Newman, CR 03-1257,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 24, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
