 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Harris v. State, CA CR 00-943,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying directed verdict motion against criminal appellant. Amount of methamphetamine possessed irrelevant to statutory prohibition against simultaneous possession of a firearm.
|
|||||
| J.R. v. State, CA 00-885,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile failed to preserve sufficiency of evidence argument for appellate review, but, even if he had, there were sufficient factors to link juvenile to methamphetamine found in his truck.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. SMI Joist Co., CA 00-891,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee failed to report new injury, he had suffered from same herniated disc since prior injury, and physicians could not state with certainty that he had sustained a new injury, evidence supported denial of workers' compensation benefits.
|
|||||
| Newsome v. State, CA CR 00-1006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal appellant's failure to proffer requested instruction on lesser-included offense did not warrant reversal on appeal. No prejudice in State calling expert to testify where expert evaluated appellant, thus was potential defense witness.
|
|||||
| Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Neely, CA 00-789,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancellor erred in refusing to enforce sister court's child support decree and modifying its support order, where order did not expressly state it nullified or superseded it.
|
|||||
| Philpot v. State, CACR 00-1098,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's finding that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his suspended sentence by committing forgery. The State had proved appellant committed one violation of the conditions.
|
|||||
| Pool v. State, CACR00-953,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Manslaughter conviction was affirmed as the trial court did not err in refusing to declare a mistrial because the trial court's admonishment to the jury to not consider an inappropriate reference by the prosecutor cured the prosecutor's act.
|
|||||
| Rowell v. Curt Bean Lumber Co., CA 00-884,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of an Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission order that reversed an award of permanent partial disability and remanded the matter to an administrative law judge to determine an issue was dismissed since it was not a final order.
|
|||||
| Songer v. Black River Area Dev., CA 00-918,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported determination of workers' compensation commission that appellant worker was not entitled to additional medical treatment and finding her healing period had ended.
|
|||||
| Southwestern Bell Mobile Sys., Inc. v. Ark. PSC, CA 00-407,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, April 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of public service commission's regulatory authority over wireless providers did not end taxing authority; wireless providers were "telephone companies" or "other similar companies" for tax purposes; appeal was on record before appellee.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
