 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Searcy v. Davenport, 02-729,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 13, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action claiming that ownership of claimant's property through a tax sale was procured by fraud was barred by res judicata as all issues were or could have been determined in prior action to quiet title. Judge was not required to recuse himself.
|
|||||
| Stinnett v. State, CR 02-643,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly denied defendant's claim for postconviction relief where defendant failed to show that the outcome of the revocation hearing would have been different had unnamed social services witnesses testified.
|
|||||
| Utley v. City of Dover, 02-243,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 13, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a property owner did not establish that a trial court's findings in favor of an annexation by a city were clearly erroneous, the annexation was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Whitfield v. State, CR 02-1389,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 13, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's pro se motion to proceed with belated appeal of trial court's denial of motion for postconviction relief was denied, where defendant did not show that notice of appeal was timely filed and failed to show good cause for late filing.
|
|||||
| Zangerl v. State, CR 02-1296,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 13, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's right to a speedy trial was violated when his trial commenced on the 600th day following his arrest. DWI charge against him was dismissed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
