 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Nooner v. State, CR 94-358,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 25, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's motions to lift the stay of execution in his case were moot, as there was nothing on supreme court's docket or in petitioner's motions to indicate that an execution date had been set or that there was a stay in effect.
|
|||||
| Omni Holding & Dev. Corp. v. 3D.S.A., Inc., 03-841,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding of civil contempt was proper where the development corporation and its managing officer failed to turn over to the sheriff assembled planes and related equipment as specified in the order of delivery.
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, CR 03-914,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order granting defendants' motions to suppress evidence seized during search of their home was upheld; failure of agents to advise them that they had right to refuse to consent to search violated their rights against warrantless intrusions into home.
|
|||||
| Waddle v. State, CR 04-179,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Until defendant's appellate counsel filed a proper motion for rule on the clerk in which he admitted fault for not filing a timely record on appeal, the appellate court refused to allow defendant's motion for rule on the clerk.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Regions Bank Trust Dep't, 03-876,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 25, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The reinstatement of a jury verdict in favor of the guardian in a negligence action was improper where the trial court reinstated the same judgment that the supreme court had just reversed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
