 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith Auto Salvage v. City of Pine Bluff, CA01-711,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 20, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City council lacked authority to grant salvage company permission to move auto salvage yard where company had not obtained use permit on review from planning commission and planning commission was delegated authority to issue such permits.
|
|||||
| Stone v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 01-954,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 20, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chancery court properly terminated mother's parental rights where she failed to abide by reunification plan and to allow her parental rights to continue would have been a detriment to the children's welfare and best interest.
|
|||||
| Summons v. State, CACR 01-841,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 20, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentences were valid where the trial judge did not specify whether they were to be consecutive or concurrent when pronounced from the bench but three weeks later issued a written order stating the sentences were to run consecutively.
|
|||||
| Young v. State, CACR01-984,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 20, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported revocation of defendant's suspended sentence based on trial court's finding he committed first-degree terroristic threatening, as it showed he acted in a belligerent, enraged manner in threatening to kill police chief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
