 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 01-782,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The individual bail bondsman, who was the sole owner of a corporation was prevented from engaging in employment as an independent contractor with courts of law by the board's interpretation of the bail bondsman rules and regulations.
|
|||||
| Davis v. St. Johns Health Sys., 01-653,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical center's designation of agent for service of process and its doing of business in state through a wholly owned subsidiary established that medical center had sufficient contacts with state to subject it to jurisdiction of state courts.
|
|||||
| Faulkens v. State, CR 01-907,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant could not demonstrate prejudice as required by the Strickland test, he was not entitled to postconviction relief for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
|
|||||
| Flores v. State, CR 01-1295,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother admitted to abuse of child victim and then shifted blame for fatal blow to defendant, statement was not admissible as statement made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment hearsay exception.
|
|||||
| Gooden v. State, CR 00-845,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Presley v. State, CR 97-282,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's motion for a copy of his transcript on appeal at public expense was denied where it was too late to file a timely post-conviction relief petition and indigency did not entitle him to free photocopies.
|
|||||
| Prince v. Norris, 01-894,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reinert v. State, CR 01-940,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute proscribing sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity with a minor was not unconstitutionally void for vagueness, and substantial evidence supported defendant's convictions for first-degree violation of a minor.
|
|||||
| Shields v. State, CR 01-288,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 21, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officers made it reasonably clear to defendant that he was only wanted for questioning, and did not have to go to police station. Trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress. Defendant was not coerced into giving his confession.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
