 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Benson v. State, CACR03-477,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In his appeal from an aggravated robbery conviction, defendant's claim that the trial court erred by denying his request for a lesser-included theft-by-receiving jury instruction was barred, as he did not prepare and submit an instruction at trial.
|
|||||
| Burris v. Burris, CA03-310,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly quieted title in property in a grantor and his son because a trustee's deed for the property in favor of the grantor and son was valid, given that the deed of the property to the trustee was also valid.
|
|||||
| Camp v. Camp, CA03-715,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly divided marital property by awarding the parties one-half of an annuity account and ordering other marital property sold and the proceeds divided; the status of the property as marital turned on credibility determinations.
|
|||||
| Carroll v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-838,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in finding that termination of parental rights was in the best interest of the child, as there was evidence that the parents' continued instability and problems would be potentially harmful to the child.
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. Baxter County Reg'l Hosp., CA03-946,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A workers' compensation commission properly found that a certain surgery was not reasonably necessary treatment for an employee because the surgery was to correct a pre-existing condition and the surgery did not improve the employee's symptoms.
|
|||||
| Green v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-1196,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in terminating the parents' parental rights, where the children were repeatedly exposed to drug use and the dangerous methamphetamine manufacturing process and the parents would not change the situation.
|
|||||
| Harman v. Kroger & Rskco, CA03-882,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission did not err in finding that bone scan was reasonably necessary for employee, where her credibility was in question, she contradicted testimony of others, and it was not supported by medical evidence.
|
|||||
| Ison Props., LLC v. Wood, CA 03-501,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the buyer failed to produce facts to support its venue argument, and because the statutes supported venue, the trial court correctly denied buyer's motion to dismiss on basis of venue. Striking buyer's defense of fraud was not untimely.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. Gulf Ins. Co., CA 03-803,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, March 31, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employees could not proceed on uninsured motorist claim, where there was no uninsured motorist or vehicle involved; insured motor vehicle was not transformed into uninsured motor vehicle because certain policy exclusions barred recovery.
|
|||||
| King v. State, CACR03-727,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court lacked the jurisdiction to revoke defendant's probation because a previous order of the trial court had already revoked defendant's probation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
