 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beahm v. First Western Bank, CA06-497,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court erred in denying a guarantor's motion for directed verdict as guaranteed note was materially modified without his consent, increasing the principal and completely changing the identity of the party whose loan the guarantor intended to guarantee. Novation did not occur so as to absolve debtor's liability as primary obligor on note.
|
|||||
| Branning v. State, CACR05-989,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for second-degree stalking, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-71-229, and terroristic threatening, Ark. Code Ann. § 5-13-301, were dismissed where, based on conduct that resulted in charges filed in another court and the same sovereign requirements were met, double jeopardy applied, and nolle prossing of misdemeanors was a final judgment.
|
|||||
| Champlin v. State, CACR06-770,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where officers saw two defendants enter two retail stores and purchase pseudoephedrine, there was probable cause to arrest them under Ark. R. Crim. P. 4.1(a)(iii); moreover, there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction for possession of such with intent to manufacture where one defendant admitted buying so someone else could cook drugs.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Ark. Dep't of HHS, CA06-1300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights was proper due to aggravated circumstances, Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341, because the mother engaged in repeated cruelty to the children by striking them, she was not credible in her testimony concerning her inability to obtain housing and employment, and she had remained unemployed over the previous two years.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA06-251,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the father's counsel's appellate brief noted that the father worked full time, had a home for the children, and had rehabilitated himself, reversal of the termination of the father's parental rights was denied considering concessions in brief, including that the father had been harmful to the children.
|
|||||
| First Ark. Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, No. CA06-721,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying a bail bond company relief under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60 where it had not filed the motion within 90 days of the entry of judgment, the order would have been nunc pro tunc even if the court had corrected the bailee's name, and the company and court knew the bailee's real name prior to judgment.
|
|||||
| Hales v. Ark. HHS, CA06-309,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a mother failed to raise any argument that would support reversing the trial court's decision to terminate her parental rights, her appeal lacked merit. The father's appeal was dismissed, because he failed to file a notice of appeal as required by Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 3(b). Counsel's motion to be relieved was granted.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, CACR06-812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in revoking defendant's suspended sentences on the ground that he violated the terms and conditions of good conduct because a violation of good conduct was not alleged in the petition to revoke, nor was a requirement to conform to good conduct contained in the written terms and conditions of his suspended sentences.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CACR 06-775,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's arrest was illegal because, although there was reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offense of owning an illegal drug paraphernalia business, that was a misdemeanor offense, for which a summons, and not an arrest warrant, should have issued under Ark. R. Crim. P. 7.1(b)(i).
|
|||||
| Lane v. Ark. Dep't of HHS, CA06-1434,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The mother's appeal of the order terminating her parental rights was wholly without merit. Counsel complied with the requirements for no-merit motions in termination cases, and was permitted to be relieved as counsel under Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-3.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
