|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Arkansas - April 4, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Branning v. State, CACR05-989,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's convictions for second-degree stalking, Ark. Code Ann. ? 5-71-229, and terroristic threatening, Ark. Code Ann. ??5-13-301, were dismissed where, based on conduct that resulted in charges filed in another court and the same sovereign requirements were met, double jeopardy applied, and nolle prossing of misdemeanors was a final judgment.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Davis v. Ark. Dep't of HHS, CA06-1300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Termination of parental rights was proper due to aggravated circumstances, Ark. Code Ann. ? 9-27-341, because the mother engaged in repeated cruelty to the children by striking them, she was not credible in her testimony concerning her inability to obtain housing and employment, and she had remained unemployed over the previous two years.
|
|
| |
Davis v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA06-251,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: While the father's counsel's appellate brief noted that the father worked full time, had a home for the children, and had rehabilitated himself, reversal of the termination of the father's parental rights was denied considering concessions in brief, including that the father had been harmful to the children.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Johnson v. State, CACR 06-775,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 4, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant's arrest was illegal because, although there was reasonable cause to believe that defendant committed the offense of owning an illegal drug paraphernalia business, that was a misdemeanor offense, for which a summons, and not an arrest warrant, should have issued under Ark. R. Crim. P. 7.1(b)(i).
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|