 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jordan v. State, No. CR 00-84,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion seeking to proceed with a belated appeal was denied because the petitioner failed to file timely a notice of appeal and, contrary to his assertion, it was not the responsibility of the clerk or anyone else to perfect an appeal.
|
|||||
| Kerr v. State, No. CR 99-273,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment dismissing petition for postconviction relief dismissed was affirmed; the merits of appellant's claim could not be reached because of the untimeliness of his petition, three years too late.
|
|||||
| McCoy v. State, No. CR 99-167,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Meny v. Norris, No. 98-1143,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Oliver v. Pulaski County Court, 00-33,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court retained jurisdiction over disciplinary action after it remanded to bail bond licensing board for development of factual record; thus, court had authority to issue subpoena duces tecum to order deposition.
|
|||||
| Orsini v. State, 98-1119,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 23, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant inmate was entitled to a hearing under the Freedom of Information Act, and appellant's request for documents for her disciplinary proceeding qualified under an exemption to a regulation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
