Arkansas, May, 2002, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Arkansas - May 8, 2002

Rosamond v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA01-942, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights was proper as child had been subjected to neglect or abuse that endangered her life; it was in child's best interest not be returned to mother's custody. Evidence was sufficient to support termination.

Search Cases for Free

Taylor v. State, CA CR 01-215, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Where trial court made no inquiry as to whether defendant understood risk in representing himself and defendant rejected his public defender, record did not reflect that defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel.

Search Cases for Free

Vergara-Soto v. State, CA CR 01-912, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant, who waited outside residence during police search that found methamphetamine and a gun, could not use statutory defense to simultaneous possession charge, as defense was limited to where defendant was present in residence.

Search Cases for Free

White v. Remington Arms Co., CA 01-1229, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Employee's first injury was not established by medical evidence supported by objective findings. Workers' Compensation Commission was within power to accept doctor's opinion that procedures should not have been performed and were not necessary.

Search Cases for Free

Wimberly v. State, CACR01-1235, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant's conviction of Class C felony theft by receiving was affirmed where he did not preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence of the value of the stolen truck to justify reducing his conviction to a misdemeanor.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal