LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arkansas - March 31, 2005

  
Smith v. Keith, No. CR 05-215, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Steele v. State, CR 05-237, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Strom v. State, No. CR 03-743, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court denied petition for postconviction relief where counsel's decision to delay his objection was a professional judgment that was not outside range of reasonable professional assistance. Defendant did not show prejudice by counsel's failure to call a witness. He could not challenge sufficiency of evidence in postconviction proceeding.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Williams v. Norris, No. 03-1401, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, March 31, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner was properly denied habeas corpus relief after he was convicted of three counts of rape because he failed to state a claim upon which habeas corpus relief could issue; petitioner did not challenge the dates of the rapes with evidence of incarceration as an alibi.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.