 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Acord v. Acord, CA 99-1145,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, JUNE 21, 2000, OPINION DELIVERED
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The wife of a deceased life tenant was not entitled to reimbursement for taxes paid and improvements made to property under the Arkansas Betterment Statute, because she had no basis for a good-faith belief that she held the land under color of title.
|
|||||
| Alltel Ark. v. Ark. Psc, CA 98-1362,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, June 21, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arkansas Public Service Commission did not make adequate findings to inform the court how and why the Commission determined that a carrier's ability to reclassify its services did not violate the Telecommunications Regulatory Reform Act of 1997.
|
|||||
| Arnold v. State, CACR99-1158,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of evidence involving other misconduct by appellant was harmless error because appellant not prejudiced by trial court's consideration of evidence; sentences modified where consecutive sentences prohibited by statute.
|
|||||
| Burrow v. State, CACR99-1195,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw where he failed to abstract all adverse rulings and explain why each such ruling would not support a meritorious appeal in accordance with the court's rule for withdrawal.
|
|||||
| Chambers v. Chambers, CA99-688,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant father's petition for visitation of his child properly dismissed where appellant failed to prove by preponderance of evidence that material change of circumstances had occurred to warrant changing previous visitation order.
|
|||||
| Christopher v. Tyson Foods, Inc., CA99-1448,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Workers' Compensation Commission finding that appellant did not prove she was permanently and totally disabled was supported by lack of medical evidence combined with releases by her treating physicians to return to work with restrictions.
|
|||||
| Degood v. Degood, CA99-1184,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although death threats and repetitive phone calls were not listed as specifically prohibited behaviors in temporary restraining order, it could have been logically inferred that such behavior would not have been permitted under terms of order.
|
|||||
| E.C. Barton & Co. v. Upton, CA99-1322,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse discretion in granting appellee's motion for new trial where court determined that there was error in assessment of amount of recovery and that verdict was contrary to preponderance of evidence and law.
|
|||||
| Hallman v. Bailey's Super Store, Inc., CA99-983,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee not entitled to workers' compensation benefits where she failed to establish objective medical findings concerning upper body injuries and failed to show she was incapacitated to earn wages as result of compensable knee injury.
|
|||||
| Hickmon v. Hickmon, CA 99-1300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 21, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court's order denying a custodial mother permission to move her daughter to another state was not clearly erroneous under the Staab factors where the mother failed to meet the threshold burden of proving some real advantage to the child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
