Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arkansas - April 7, 2005

  
Scott v. State, No. CR 04-922, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: The supreme court granted defendant's petition following his conviction for aggravated robbery to proceed on appeal as a pauper, for the appointment of appellate counsel, and to ensure that the remainder of the record was lodged in the supreme court for the appeal.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Oldner, 04-995, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Mayor was convicted of witness tampering and abuse of office, which were crimes involving dishonesty and deceit. Also, his convictions directly impacted his ability to serve as an elected official. Thus, mayor was convicted of infamous crimes under Ark. Const. art. 5, ? 9, and trial court erred in denying State's petition to remove him from office.

Search Cases for Free

  
Teston v. Ark. State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 04-420, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence supported Board's finding that physical therapist's treatments that caused patients' spines to "pop" were spinal manipulations under Ark. Code Ann. ? 17-81-102(7) that could only be performed by licensed chiropractors, and that he was not practicing physical therapy, defined as passive manipulation of joints within normal range of motion.

Search Cases for Free

  
Tillman v. Plegge, No. CR 05-304, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Turner v. State, No. CR 04-1161, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Young v. Dennis, No. 05-263, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 7, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: In a criminal case, petitioner's motion to continue with a mandamus petition because he was not informed of its dismissal and disagreed with the trial court's ruling was denied as the trial court had already acted on the petition for writ of habeas corpus (the subject of the mandamus action); thus, the petition for writ of mandamus was moot.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top