 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Pedraza v. State, No. CR06-293,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 13, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion for rule on the clerk was granted where appellant's attorney candidly admitted fault because the attorney stated in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
|
|||||
| State v. Townsend, No. CR 05-1263,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 13, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court abused its discretion under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-42-101 when it granted a motion filed by defendant who was accused of raping his step-granddaughter to introduce evidence that his step-granddaughter was sexually assaulted by someone else when she was four years old because information was not relevant to allegations against defendant.
|
|||||
| Wood v. State, No. CR 05-741,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 13, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 as the inmate raised issues on appeal that were not raised in the trial court and did not prepare an appellate record that was sufficient to demonstrate error.
|
|||||
| Wright v. City of Little Rock , No. 05-683,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 13, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owners' appeal of the denial of nonconforming use status was improperly dismissed because appeal was perfected under Ark. Dist. Ct. R. 9 by the timely filing of record in circuit court. Ark. R. Civ. P. 4 did not apply because there was no requirement of service of summons and complaint; relief sought was the appeal of the zoning decision.
|
|||||
| Young v. Barbera, No. 05-778,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, April 13, 2006, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court erred in reducing appellant's medical damages from $ 7,135 to $ 4,500; appellant's uncontradicted testimony showed that nine months of chiropractic treatments were reasonable and necessary after attack by appellee, and there was no requirement that chiropractor had to testify as to reasonableness and necessity of the treatments.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
