 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anhalt v. State, CA CR 99-1264,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to specifically state in search warrant that a nighttime search was justified did not require suppression of evidence seized pursuant to the warrant.
|
|||||
| Beatty v. State, No. CA 99-1231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the juvenile court's finding that appellant should be adjudicated a juvenile delinquent for criminal mischief in the second degree.
|
|||||
| Brandon v. State, No. CACR 99-1077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's statements were not suppressed where he waived his Miranda rights by singing a form, and voluntarily spoke to officer. There was enough substantial evidence linking him to the crime to deny directed verdict.
|
|||||
| Carver v. Rylee, No. CA99-843,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not entitled to appellate review because he failed to bring up a record sufficient to demonstrate that the trial court was in error.
|
|||||
| Dennis v. Dennis, CA 99-626,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was not clearly erroneous in finding testimony presented by husband to overcome the presumption that proceeds from the sale of the parties' marital home should have been divided equally upon the parties' divorce.
|
|||||
| Dunn v. State, No. CACR99-1005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testimony of a rape victim that she and appellant had sexual intercourse was sufficient evidence to support defendant's conviction for rape.
|
|||||
| Emerson v. State, No. CACR 99-1002,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court was without authority to modify appellant's sentence because amendment, giving courts authority to modify sentences pursuant to petition to revoke probation, did not apply retroactively.
|
|||||
| George v. George, No. CA99-633,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Award of child support based on father's past income rather than expected future income was not an abuse of discretion. Given the parties' earning capacity imbalance, grant of alimony was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, No. CACR99-551,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant was not entitled to appellate review of his conviction for second-degree murder where he had failed to comply with Arkansas abstracting rules for presentation of appeals.
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Tyson Foods Inc., No. CA 99-1048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, April 5, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits where she failed to present evidence that she had advised her physicians of her injury and she failed to introduce records or testimony of any treatment received.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
